There are a ton of flaws in the record-keeping case against former President Donald Trump by the Manhattan District Attorney and former Justice Department lawyer Alvin Bragg, but there's one big head-shaking flaw that even Trump detractors can't get over. The issue is over the timing of the 34 alleged "crimes" for which Trump stands trial.
...
The founder of the Article III Project and Trump supporter, Mike Davis, wonders how someone could steal an election if all the alleged "crimes" happened in 2017 — after the election. All 34 charges are stated to have happened after the election, according to Bragg's indictment.
Davis, a former clerk for Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch and a former U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee lawyer, says Bragg's theory is garbage.
"What Alvin Bragg is trying to say with his bogus legal theory is that when [Trump] booked these in 2017, it was somehow a campaign benefit... [and] campaign finance violation from 2016. It is a laughable legal theory," he said in a radio interview.
"[Bragg's] theory is that back in 2016 President Trump allegedly paid off a nuisance claim to make someone go away, which businessmen do all the time, and then Trump's bookkeepers and accountants booked it in 2017 allegedly," he added. He says that makes no sense.
...
To underscore the political nature of the charges and trial, "This is the Soros-funded Manhattan D.A. Alvin Bragg, who is downgrading violent felony charges against people who are pushing old ladies down the stairs at churches and punching kids in the face," Davis told a radio audience.
"He's not going after those violent criminals; they're downgrading them to misdemeanors at best and sometimes letting them go while they're trying to upgrade these bookkeeping misdemeanors that are, at best, clearly time-barred beyond the statute of limitations to go after Trump," he added.
...
Read the full article HERE.
